NEWPublish & promote AI tools — get Featured FREEFeatured FREESubmit Tool
← Back to Comparisons Flagship Models

Claude Fable 5 vs Mythos 5 vs Opus 4.8 vs ChatGPT 5.6 vs Gemini 3.5 vs GLM 5.2 (June 2026)

Models compared

Claude Fable 5Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
ChatGPT 5.6OpenAI
Gemini 3.5Google
GLM 5.2Zhipu AI
Grok 4xAI
DeepSeek V4DeepSeek
Feature
Claude Fable 5
Claude Mythos 5
Claude Opus 4.8
ChatGPT 5.6
Gemini 3.5
GLM 5.2
Grok 4
DeepSeek V4
Availability GA Glasswing GA GA GA GA GA GA
Context Window 1M 1M 200K+ 256K 2M+ 512K 256K 128K
Max Output 128K 128K 64K 64K 64K 32K 16K 64K
Reasoning Best Best Excellent Excellent Very Good Very Good Good Excellent
Coding / Agents Best Best Excellent Excellent Very Good Good Good Excellent
Multimodal Vision Vision Vision Full Native Vision Image Text-first
Safety Refusals Classifiers❌ None Strong Moderate Moderate Moderate Light Light
Real-Time Data Tools Tools Tools Browse Search Limited X Live
Open Weights Partial Partial Yes
API In / Out ($/1M)$10 / $50$10 / $50$15 / $75$12 / $48$8 / $32$4 / $16$10 / $40$1 / $4
Consumer Sub$20/moEnterprise$20/mo$22/mo$20/mo$12/mo$16/moFree tier
Best ForAgentic workNo-refusal APIStable prodEcosystemLong docsBilingualLive newsBudget / OSS

🏆 Our Verdict

Claude Fable 5 leads for long-horizon agentic work and careful reasoning with 1M context. Claude Mythos 5 matches Fable without safety refusals but is limited-release. ChatGPT 5.6 wins ecosystem breadth and multimodal polish. Gemini 3.5 dominates extreme context and Google integration. GLM 5.2 is the bilingual value pick. DeepSeek V4 is the open-weight price leader. Most teams mix two or three — rarely just one.

June 2026 is the most competitive frontier-model landscape yet. Anthropic now ships three distinct Claude tiers — Claude Fable 5 (generally available), Claude Mythos 5 (limited Glasswing release without safety classifiers), and the still-widely-deployed Claude Opus 4.8. OpenAI's ChatGPT 5.6, Google's Gemini 3.5, Zhipu's GLM 5.2, xAI's Grok 4, and DeepSeek V4 round out the field.

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Mythos 5

Both share identical specs: 1M-token context, up to 128K output tokens, adaptive thinking, and the same API pricing ($10/$50 per million tokens). The difference is policy: Fable 5 includes safety classifiers that can return stop_reason: refusals — you need fallback handling in production. Mythos 5 removes those classifiers for teams that need unconstrained completions, but is only available through Anthropic's Project Glasswing limited release. If you lack Mythos access, Fable 5 is the upgrade path from Opus 4.8.

Claude Opus 4.8 — still relevant?

Yes for teams mid-migration. Opus 4.8 remains excellent for coding and long-form analysis with 200K+ context and mature SDK patterns. Anthropic recommends migrating agentic pipelines to Fable 5 for 1M context, task budgets, and programmatic tool calling — but Opus 4.8 is stable, well-understood, and still powers many Claude Code deployments.

ChatGPT 5.6 (OpenAI)

OpenAI's consumer and API flagship balances reasoning depth with the richest plugin, Custom GPT, and developer ecosystem. Strong multimodal (voice, vision, image gen), dependable enterprise compliance, and the default choice for teams already on Azure/OpenAI. Slightly shorter context than Gemini or Claude Fable, but unmatched integration breadth.

Gemini 3.5 (Google)

Google's answer for users living in Workspace, Android, and Search. Up to 2M-token context handles full codebases and long video. Native multimodal across text, image, audio, and video in one pass. Best pick for research-heavy workflows and Google-centric enterprises.

GLM 5.2 (Zhipu AI)

The standout bilingual model for Chinese–English teams. Competitive API pricing, solid agentic tool use, and growing open-weight releases make GLM 5.2 the value frontier pick — especially for APAC deployments and hybrid stacks alongside Western models.

Grok 4 & DeepSeek V4

Grok 4 differentiates with live X/Twitter data and a witty, news-first personality — ideal for social and media workflows. DeepSeek V4 continues to disrupt on price: open weights, strong reasoning, and API costs a fraction of Claude or GPT — the default for cost-sensitive engineering teams.

How to choose

Software & agents: Claude Fable 5 or ChatGPT 5.6. Google shops: Gemini 3.5. Bilingual CN/EN: GLM 5.2. Budget / self-host: DeepSeek V4. Real-time social: Grok 4. No-refusal Anthropic tier: Claude Mythos 5 (if you have Glasswing access). Most professionals run a primary + a budget fallback.

See also: ChatGPT vs Claude, Claude vs Gemini, and DeepSeek vs ChatGPT.

More Comparisons

Comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Fable 5

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Fable 5 head-to-head — coding agents, reasoning depth, safety, pricing, multi-agent workflows, and which model wins for production agents.

Comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.5

Sol vs Grok 4.5 compared — frontier reasoning vs real-time X signal, coding agents, research workflows, pricing posture, and agent use cases.

Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Pro

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Pro — context windows, Google Workspace agents, coding quality, enterprise controls, and which to choose in 2026.

Comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Pro

Grok 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Pro compared — live X signal vs Google Workspace agents, research quality, multimodal, and enterprise fit.

Comparison

Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Pro (July 2026)

Four-way frontier comparison: GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5, Grok 4.5, and Gemini 3.5 Pro — agents, coding, context, real-time signal, and enterprise fit.

Comparison

ChatGPT vs Gemini

Head-to-head comparison of ChatGPT and Google Gemini — features, pricing, strengths, weaknesses, and our verdict.

Comparison

ChatGPT vs Claude

ChatGPT vs Claude compared — coding ability, safety, pricing, context windows, and which to choose for work vs personal use.

Comparison

Claude vs Gemini

Anthropic Claude vs Google Gemini — coding, reasoning, context length, safety, and enterprise fit compared side by side.